Opinion · Business coaching

Stop Selling Sessions. Sell the Decision.

Hourly pricing makes you a cost line. Pricing against a decision makes you a participant in it — and changes who in the organisation can say yes to you.

Marta VieiraEditor, Business desk · 8 min

A session has no value. That sounds hostile, so let me put it precisely: a session has no value that a buyer can evaluate before they have bought several of them. It is an hour of conversation, and every coach in the market is selling an hour of conversation. When the unit is identical, the only remaining variable is price, and you will lose that competition to someone with lower costs or a platform subsidy.

The decision is different. A chief operating officer deciding whether to restructure a division is not buying hours. They are buying the ability to think about something enormous without either performing certainty for their team or leaking doubt to their board. That has a value they can estimate, and the estimate is not anchored to what an hour costs.

What changes when you re-anchor

Three things, in my experience, and only the first is about money.

The engagement acquires a shape. A decision has a beginning, a middle where the real work happens, and a point after which it is made. That is a natural contract length. Open-ended monthly retainers, by contrast, end when someone gets busy, which is usually just before the hard part.

The buyer changes. Hours are approved by a talent budget. Decisions are approved by whoever owns the decision. This is the single largest practical difference, and it is why coaches who make this shift often report that their sales cycle got shorter rather than longer.

And your own preparation changes, because you now have to understand the decision well enough to be useful about it. Some coaches regard this as a violation — that knowing the domain compromises the non-directive stance. I think that confuses being informed with being prescriptive. You can know exactly how a restructure works and still not tell anyone what to do.

The objection worth taking seriously

The strongest argument against this is that it invites outcome liability. If you sell the decision and the decision goes badly, you are implicated in a way you are not when you sold hours.

That is true, and it is the price. It is also, I would argue, the thing that separates a profession from a service. Every field that charges what coaching charges at the top of the market accepts some version of this exposure.

What you should not do is take the exposure without the pricing. Which is, at the moment, exactly what most of the field does.

  • pricing
  • positioning
  • practice

Read next

Sports

The Assistant's Decade

The most consequential job in professional sport is the one nobody photographs. Ten years of promotion data suggests the ladder has quietly inverted.

Tom HalloranSports editor9 min

Technology

Against the Dashboard

Every coaching platform now ships analytics. Almost none of them measure the thing the client came for, and the measuring is starting to change the work.

Nina FalkTechnology editor7 min